|
|
|
|
|
Forum Name :
Should GAIL get monopoly rights over the national gas grid ?
|
<< Bulletin Board Home
|
Total 34 reply(s),
0
new reply(s) posted today.
|
|
|
This Forum has replies in pages.
|
|
|
|
Should GAIL get monopoly rights over the national gas grid
|
13 Jul 2004 11:36 AM
|
|
GAIL has of late gone on the offensive for becoming the sole agency for implementation and operation of the proposed nationwide gas grid. The gas operator"es case is quite strong. The company has claimed complete ownership of the grid on grounds of sensitivity and project value, both in terms of cost and energy security. Further, it has argued that globally 38 out of 39 countries preferred single ownership of the gas network. What is more, the usual practice is to ensure public or state ownership, except USA which has a multiplayer system. Also, the argument goes, single ownership of gas grid would ensure uninterrupted and consistent supply of gas to the markets, along with operational cost savings for the economy. However, others disagree with GAIL"es views, notably Reliance, Shell and BP. Their argument is that the 7,900 km. gas grid should not be restricted to one player. Rather, it should be left to market forces. The government conferred monopoly status on GAIL in its draft gas pipeline policy. But, continuing debate on the matter and vehement objections from the abovementioned private players has shaken the government"es resolve and it is still undecided on the ownership pattern of the gas grid . "How about you? Do you feel the national gas grid would be better off with a GAIL monopoly or do you think other players should also take part in the process? Click on our Bulletin Board ( it is not password protected) and write in your views."
|
|
|
|
|
|
SouthWind80
|
rJDqTvSlGtPF
|
22 Oct 2009 10:20 AM
|
|
Now we can give our 'second amendment', which is that transitions of this 'isomeric' kind are the only ones in which we shall be interested in our biological application. ,
|
|
ThockyThoff
|
Hi People
|
14 Oct 2009 05:20 AM
|
|
Hi People
How are you doing?
|
|
DUvWVFFVWucH
|
wCdbxLAYpWOcauT
|
11 Oct 2009 11:12 AM
|
|
awegaw1.txt;2;5
|
|
merriesmti
|
components thermal
|
25 Jul 2009 03:11 PM
|
|
stabilized assumptions stabilized national evaporation policymakers
|
|
lauralcoil
|
suggested increased
|
23 Jul 2009 07:58 AM
|
|
slow extinctions level limits warming inc
|
|
fabionbian
|
stories serious majority
|
23 Jul 2009 07:56 AM
|
|
live continues features referred peter warming
|
|
minnickup
|
Thanks for ...
|
04 Jul 2009 05:06 PM
|
|
Good Day,
I like the way you set up that your www.indianpetrochem.com forum is the homepage, nicely done. Thanks!
|
|
fugclurfhougs
|
I want to share the view
|
30 Jun 2009 03:31 PM
|
|
Hello
I like it
I like it here
|
|
fugclurfhougs
|
the most interesting forum
|
28 Jun 2009 07:08 AM
|
|
Hello World!
I have long searched for a good forum
I will stay here for long
|
|
A K Srivastava
|
Pipeline transportation business to be competitive
|
16 Nov 2005 11:27 PM
|
|
Giving monopoly right to a party is likely to distort especially gas market and very purpose of flow of gas from one part of India to another part may hamper. This may also lead to a situation when consumers may have to pay higher transportation charges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|